VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > MARTHA FRANKS BAPTIST RETIREMENT CENTER

MARTHA FRANKS BAPTIST RETIREMENT CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
MARTHA FRANKS BAPTIST RETIREMENT CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City LAURENS   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have LAURENS
State attribute explanation SC   vs 1.2% Nursing Homes USA have SC
Street ONE MARTHA FRANKS DRIVE  
Zip Code 29360  
Phone 8649844541  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
88  (20.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
77  (14.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
88 % (4.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/8/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/8/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
10  (2.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
77  (14.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.42  (0.35 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.21  (0.37 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.64  (0.05 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 11/07/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 11/07/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 02/27/2012
date Of Correction: 03/22/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 02/27/2012
date Of Correction: 03/23/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 11/07/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 11/07/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 11/07/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 11/07/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 11/07/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 10/12/2010
date Of Correction: 11/07/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25 % (0.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.1 % (30.85 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.5 % (7.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (62.62 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.50 % (10.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.4 % (12.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 21.2:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 16.3:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75 % (9.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
70 % (13.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
8.8 % (6.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.6 % (0.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.1 % (21.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 9.4 / 10.4 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.5 % (4.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3 % (5.5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
60.9 % (17.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
18.9 % (9.32 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.3 % (4.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.4 % (10.36 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
61.5 % (19.94 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
58.6 % (16.15 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 10.7:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved