VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > MATLOCK PLACE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

MATLOCK PLACE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
MATLOCK PLACE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City ARLINGTON   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have ARLINGTON
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 7100 MATLOCK RD  
Zip Code 76002  
Phone 8174662511  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
100  (8.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
83 % (0.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/16/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/14/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
12  (4.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
100  (8.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.37  (0.4 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.92  (0.08 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.29  (0.3 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.2  (5.29 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.2  (0.1 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 12/11/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Follow Policies And Procedures To Convey The Resident's Personal Funds To The Appropriate Party Responsible After The Resident's Death.
survey Date: 04/30/2010
date Of Correction: 05/24/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 12/11/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.
survey Date: 12/11/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible.
survey Date: 12/11/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 12/11/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Quickly Tell The Resident's Doctor The Results Of Lab Tests.
survey Date: 04/30/2010
date Of Correction: 05/24/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 08/11/2010
date Of Correction: 09/07/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 12/11/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 12/11/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 12/11/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 12/11/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.2-20 % (13.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22 % (5.34 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14 % (1.42 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.9 % (7.93 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
60 % (15.46 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.1 % (14.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 11.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
31.5 % (6.48 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
86 % (1.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
81.9 % (2.04 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.4 % (9.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.6 % (23.1 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.8 % (10.7 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.8 % (4.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
58.5 % (15.12 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.9 % (8.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.3 % (1.72 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.3 % (4.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
35.9 % (11.14 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.5 % (7.94 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
52.4 % (22.35 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
23.5 % (6.16 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved