VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > MATTHEWS MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE CENTER

MATTHEWS MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
MATTHEWS MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Alexandria  vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have Alexandria
State attribute explanation LA   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have LA
Street 5100 JACKSON STREET EXT.  
Zip Code 71303  
Phone 3184455215  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
157  (48.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
89  (2.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
57 % (26.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/29/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/26/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(54.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(51.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
89  (2.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.48  (0.29 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.9  (0.06 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.37  (0.22 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 12/09/2010
date Of Correction: 01/24/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 03/22/2010
date Of Correction: 05/11/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/12/2011
date Of Correction: 09/20/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 08/25/2010
date Of Correction: 10/09/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 03/22/2010
date Of Correction: 05/11/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 03/22/2010
date Of Correction: 05/11/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 08/25/2010
date Of Correction: 10/09/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Review Or Revise The Resident's Care Plan After Any Major Change In A Resident's Physical Or Mental Health.
survey Date: 08/25/2010
date Of Correction: 10/09/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 05/13/2010
date Of Correction: 06/27/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.7 % (8.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 7.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.7 % (2.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
15.5 % (3.67 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
60 % (15.46 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.3 % (13.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
16.7 % (3.24 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.3 % (26.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.1 % (42.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.7 % (16.32 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96 % (12.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7 % (9.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 17.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.9 % (7.2 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.5 % (2.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.1 % (7.6 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
52.1 % (8.72 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.7 % (6.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
12.4-2413.6-24 % (2.82 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2 % (17.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.2 % (37.33 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5 % (7.23 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.5 % (21.26 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.5 % (17.06 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.4 % (15.65 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 5.6:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved