VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > MCALLISTER NURSING & REHAB

MCALLISTER NURSING & REHAB

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
MCALLISTER NURSING & REHAB VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City TINLEY PARK   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have TINLEY PARK
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 18300 S. LAVERGNE AVE  
Zip Code 60477  
Phone 7087982272  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
111  (2.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
96  (4.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
86 % (2.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/2/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/14/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
96  (4.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.18  (0.59 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.88  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.06  (0.53 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/21/2011
date Of Correction: 04/27/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That A Working Call System Is Available In Each Resident's Room Or Bathroom And Bathing Area.
survey Date: 05/26/2009
date Of Correction: 05/30/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 11/23/2010
date Of Correction: 12/23/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 12/15/2010
date Of Correction: 01/13/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 04/21/2011
date Of Correction: 04/27/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Specialized Rehabilitative Services Per The Patient's Assessment Or Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 05/26/2009
date Of Correction: 05/30/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 01/25/2010
date Of Correction: 01/31/2010 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Menus Meet The Resident's Nutritional Needs And That There Is A Prepared Menu By Which Nutritious Meals Have Been Planned For The Resident And Followed.
survey Date: 04/21/2011
date Of Correction: 04/27/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature.
survey Date: 12/15/2010
date Of Correction: 01/13/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21 % (4.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.5 % (7.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12 % (0.58 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.1 % (0.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.8 % (12.74 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.2 % (12.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3 % (10.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3 % (25.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.20 % (41.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
9.5 % (75.14 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
75.2 % (8.74 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 % (13.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 22.4:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3 % (21.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.9 % (1.68 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.2-20 % (2.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.5 % (12.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4 % (6.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.1 % (4.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.7 % (14.16 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.8 % (36.73 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6 % (7.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.8 % (2.04 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
11.5 % (69.94 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 9.4 / 10.4 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved