VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > MCKINLEY COURT

MCKINLEY COURT

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
MCKINLEY COURT VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City DECATUR   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have DECATUR
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 500 WEST MCKINLEY AVENUE  
Zip Code 62526  
Phone 2178750020  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
150  (41.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
140  (48.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
93 % (9.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/22/2011  
Fire Survey Date 1/12/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
140  (48.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.49  (0.28 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.38  (0.54 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.87  (0.28 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (5.46 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 09/22/2010
date Of Correction: 10/04/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 04/21/2010
date Of Correction: 05/21/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 04/21/2010
date Of Correction: 05/21/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 04/21/2010
date Of Correction: 05/21/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 04/21/2010
date Of Correction: 05/21/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Post Nurse Staffing Information/data On A Daily Basis.
survey Date: 02/10/2010
date Of Correction: 02/19/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8 % (17.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.3 % (25.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12 % (4.66 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
15.5 % (2.92 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.8 % (10.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.3 % (11.24 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.2 % (11.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.8 % (11.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 8.6:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 12.6:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.8 % (3.16 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (13.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.6 % (15.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.6 % (20.1 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.6 % (3.5 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 17.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5 % (5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.8 % (10.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.9 % (5.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4 % (8.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.8 % (17.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 12.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (9.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 12.3:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.7 % (8.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.7 % (24.95 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 19.4:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved