VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > MEADOW PARK CARE CENTER

MEADOW PARK CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
MEADOW PARK CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PRESCOTT   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have PRESCOTT
State attribute explanation AZ   vs 0.9% Nursing Homes USA have AZ
Street 864 DOUGHERTY ST  
Zip Code 86305  
Phone 9287789667  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
64  (44.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
61  (30.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
95 % (11.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/8/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/15/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 18  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
61  (30.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.62  (0.15 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.35  (0.49 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.97  (0.62 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/25/2009
date Of Correction: 11/24/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 03/08/2012
date Of Correction: 04/13/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 01/07/2011
date Of Correction: 02/15/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 09/25/2009
date Of Correction: 11/24/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 09/25/2009
date Of Correction: 11/24/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 03/08/2012
date Of Correction: 04/13/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Notice To The Resident Before A Room Or Roommate Change.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/20/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/20/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/20/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 03/08/2012
date Of Correction: 04/13/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 03/08/2012
date Of Correction: 04/13/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 09/25/2009
date Of Correction: 11/24/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 09/25/2009
date Of Correction: 11/24/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 07/16/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 07/16/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/20/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/20/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 03/08/2012
date Of Correction: 04/13/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.4 (90.3) % (7.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.3 % (6.53 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 % (12.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4 % (11.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4 % (25.98 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
31 % (53.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
42.4 % (41.54 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
6.5 % (39.4 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4 % (11.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.6 % (8.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.7 % (0.4 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.8 % (5.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.6 % (6.9 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.1 % (13.72 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.7 % (8.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.50 % (18.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.50 % (37.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.2 % (6.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.6 % (0.16 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
32.8 % (48.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
36 % (38.75 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
41.8 % (24.46 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved