VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > MESSIAH LIFEWAYS AT MESSIAH VILLAGE

MESSIAH LIFEWAYS AT MESSIAH VILLAGE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
MESSIAH LIFEWAYS AT MESSIAH VILLAGE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City MECHANICSBURG   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have MECHANICSBURG
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 100 MOUNT ALLEN DRIVE  
Zip Code 17055  
Phone 7176974666  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
184  (75.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
175  (83.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
95 % (11.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/19/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/27/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Church Related  vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Church related
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
175  (83.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.65  (0.12 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.78  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.43  (0.16 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (5.41 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/24/2010
date Of Correction: 07/05/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 05/24/2010
date Of Correction: 07/05/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 02/22/2010
date Of Correction: 03/15/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 05/20/2009
date Of Correction: 07/01/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.
survey Date: 05/24/2010
date Of Correction: 07/05/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 05/24/2010
date Of Correction: 07/05/2010 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 06/23/2010
date Of Correction: 07/19/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.1 % (20.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.1 % (31.85 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.5 % (5.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.8 % (9.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.4 % (4.43 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
83.1 % (38.56 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 % (13.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.1 % (7.36 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2 % (26.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.7 % (40.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.2 % (8.82 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.6 % (11.96 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.1 % (12.16 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.1 % (11.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.9 % (19.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.1 % (22.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12 % (2.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.4 % (6.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8 % (1.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
77.6 % (34.22 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 % (8.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.9 % (3.68 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2 % (17.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2 % (36.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8 % (6.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19 % (5.76 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.7 % (12.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.2 % (21.45 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.1 % (16.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved