MIDMICHIGAN GLADWIN PINES NH

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	GLADWIN	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have GLADWIN
State attribute explanation	MI	vs	2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MI	compare MI Nursing Homes USA
Street	449 QUARTER STREET
Zip Code	48624
Phone	9894263430
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	97 (5.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (97)
Percent of Occupied Beds	81 % (2.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (81) %
Health Survey Date	1/13/2012
Fire Survey Date	1/13/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Non Profit - Corporation	vs	18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation	compare Non profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	6 (52.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	6 (50.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	19 (11.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	97 (5.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.4 (0.37 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.89 (0.05 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.3 (0.29 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.02 (5.47 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.02 (0.08 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 01/19/2012 date Of Correction: 02/08/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 12/08/2011 date Of Correction: 01/01/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 10/27/2011 date Of Correction: 11/04/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 03/16/2011 date Of Correction: 04/21/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 10/16/2009 date Of Correction: 12/11/2009
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 10/16/2009 date Of Correction: 12/11/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 01/19/2012 date Of Correction: 02/08/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 12/08/2011 date Of Correction: 01/01/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 06/28/2011 date Of Correction: 08/03/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 06/28/2011 date Of Correction: 08/03/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/08/2011 date Of Correction: 07/14/2011
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 06/08/2011 date Of Correction: 07/14/2011
Deficiency #7		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 04/07/2011 date Of Correction: 05/03/2011
Deficiency #8		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 06/25/2009 date Of Correction: 08/12/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 03/16/2011 date Of Correction: 04/21/2011

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 04/07/2011 date Of Correction: 05/03/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs. survey Date: 10/16/2009 date Of Correction: 12/11/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 06/25/2009 date Of Correction: 08/12/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 06/25/2009 date Of Correction: 08/12/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	13.4 % (11.69 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	5.8 % (10.86 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	5.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	11.5 % (0.33 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	23.5 % (21.04 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.6 % (11.03 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	2.6 / 3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.3 % (27.08 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	5.1 % (38.58 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	17.2 % (7.82 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	100 % (15.36 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	100 % (16.06 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.8 % (11.72 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	15.3 % (10.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.8 % (22.9 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	9.5 % (4.6 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	3.6 % (5.62 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	9.1 % (0.6 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	25.7 % (17.68 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.9 % (7.75 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7 % (2.58 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	2.6 / 3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	4.3 % (34.23 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.5 % (7.23 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	24.3 % (0.46 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	100 % (18.56 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	100 % (25.25 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	12.1:1 %