VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > MILLCREEK HEALTH CENTER

MILLCREEK HEALTH CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
MILLCREEK HEALTH CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SALT LAKE CITY   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have SALT LAKE CITY
State attribute explanation UT   vs 0.6% Nursing Homes USA have UT
Street 3520 SOUTH HIGHLAND DRIVE  
Zip Code 84106  
Phone 8014847638  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
(107.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
54  (37.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
89 % (5.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/29/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/27/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? Yes  vs 1% Nursing Homes USA have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
20  (12.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
54  (37.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.84  (0.07 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (0.74 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94  (0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/20/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/17/2009
date Of Correction: 07/30/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 07/20/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 07/20/2010
date Of Correction: 08/20/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 07/20/2010
date Of Correction: 08/20/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/22/2010
date Of Correction: 07/30/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 02/11/2010
date Of Correction: 04/01/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 07/20/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 06/22/2010
date Of Correction: 07/30/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 02/11/2010
date Of Correction: 04/01/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 07/20/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 07/20/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/20/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 06/17/2009
date Of Correction: 07/30/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 06/17/2009
date Of Correction: 07/30/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 07/20/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/20/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 06/22/2010
date Of Correction: 07/30/2010 

Electrical Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Installed Electrical Wiring And Equipment.
survey Date: 10/15/2009
date Of Correction: 12/07/2009 

Building Service Equipment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Restrictions On The Use Of Portable Space Heaters.
survey Date: 10/15/2009
date Of Correction: 12/07/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29 % (12.34 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.3 % (2.53 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.5 % (11.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7 % (9.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.7 % (11.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.9 % (41.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 5.6:1 % 
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
67.9 % (42.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
33.4 % (19.3 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.50 % (7.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 11.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.5 % (24.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.3 % (7.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.6 % (4.98 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
15.4 % (4.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.2 % (35.33 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.8 % (4.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %



Scroll To Top

saved