MILNER COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	ROSSVILLE	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have ROSSVILLE
State attribute explanation	IN	vs	3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN	compare IN Nursing Homes USA
Street	370 E MAIN ST
Zip Code	46065
Phone	7653792112
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	80 (28.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (80)
Total Number of Residents	70 (21.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (70)
Percent of Occupied Beds	88 % (4.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (88) %
Health Survey Date	4/17/2012
Fire Survey Date	4/23/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Non Profit - Corporation	vs	18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation	compare Non profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	Yes	vs	9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	2 (56.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	2 (54.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	10 (2.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	70 (21.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.47 (0.3 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.23 (0.39 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.69 (0.1 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.05 (5.44 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.05 (0.05 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 07/15/2010 date Of Correction: 08/06/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 06/04/2009 date Of Correction: 07/03/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 06/30/2010 date Of Correction: 07/30/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 06/04/2009 date Of Correction: 07/03/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 07/15/2010 date Of Correction: 08/06/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 06/04/2009 date Of Correction: 07/03/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 06/30/2010 date Of Correction: 07/30/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 06/30/2010 date Of Correction: 07/30/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 06/04/2009 date Of Correction: 07/03/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Ensure That All Full-time Nurse Aids Employed For More Than 4 Months Are Fully Trained And Competent To Provide Nursing And Nursing-related Services, As Defined By Federal Requirements. survey Date: 06/04/2009 date Of Correction: 07/03/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	16.4 % (8.69 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	4.6 % (28.35 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	26.7 % (10.04 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	12.5 % (0.08 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.8 % (6.03 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	61.1 % (16.56 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.2 % (14.43 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	14.5 % (1.04 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	2.9 % (25.48 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.4 % (42.28 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	42.9 % (17.88 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	100 % (15.36 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	93 % (9.06 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	16.5 % (8.89 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.50 % (22.2 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	26.2 % (12.1 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	15 % (5.78 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.1 % (3.4 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	58.7 % (15.32 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.6 % (9.05 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	8.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.6 % (18.26 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.50 % (37.03 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	47.6 % (22.84 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	98 % (16.56 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	89.3 % (14.55 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	19.6 % (2.26 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %