VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > MOUNT ROYAL TOWERS

MOUNT ROYAL TOWERS

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
MOUNT ROYAL TOWERS VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Birmingham  vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have Birmingham
State attribute explanation AL   vs 1.5% Nursing Homes USA have AL
Street 300 ROYAL TOWER DRIVE  
Zip Code 35209  
Phone 2058705666  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
143  (34.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
105  (13.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
73 % (10.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/13/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/12/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(53.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(50.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 13  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
105  (13.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.53  (0.24 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.26  (0.42 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.79  (0.2 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 09/02/2011
date Of Correction: 09/30/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/05/2009
date Of Correction: 09/11/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 09/02/2011
date Of Correction: 09/30/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Establish And Follow A Written Policy That Permits A Resident To Return To The Nursing Home After Hospitalization.
survey Date: 08/15/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed.
survey Date: 08/15/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 08/15/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 09/02/2011
date Of Correction: 09/30/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 08/15/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 09/19/2009
date Of Correction: 11/02/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 09/05/2009
date Of Correction: 09/06/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 09/19/2009
date Of Correction: 11/02/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/19/2009
date Of Correction: 11/02/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/05/2009
date Of Correction: 11/02/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
46.8 % (21.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.1 % (12.56 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.7 % (2.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.5 % (3.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
56.8 % (12.26 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.5 % (12.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.4 % (7.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.2 % (40.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 10.3:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.7 % (2.06 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.3 % (9.36 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.3 % (10.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
46.2 % (20.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2 % (21.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.3 % (10.8 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.5 % (1.28 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.3 % (0.8 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
52.8 % (9.42 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.1 % (5.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.6 % (34.93 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.1 % (5.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.7 % (15.06 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.3 % (4.86 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
92.8 % (18.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5 - 2.0 % (16.84 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved