Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
| MOUNTAIN MANOR OF PAINTSVILLE | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
| Staff Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Residents |
117 (25.62 higher than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
| Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.8 (0.03 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
| Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.68 (0.16 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
| Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.48 (0.11 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
| Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.03 (5.46 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
| Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.03 (0.07 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
||
| Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 01/06/2012 date Of Correction: 02/03/2012 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 11/03/2010 date Of Correction: 12/07/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 06/03/2010 date Of Correction: 07/18/2010 |
||||
| Mistreatment Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 11/03/2010 date Of Correction: 12/07/2010 |
||||
| Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed. survey Date: 11/22/2011 date Of Correction: 01/06/2012 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 11/03/2010 date Of Correction: 12/07/2010 |
||||
| Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 01/06/2012 date Of Correction: 02/03/2012 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 01/06/2012 date Of Correction: 02/03/2012 |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give The Right Treatment And Services To Residents Who Have Mental Or Psychosocial Problems Adjusting. survey Date: 02/14/2011 date Of Correction: 03/30/2011 |
||||
| Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 11/03/2010 date Of Correction: 12/07/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 06/03/2010 date Of Correction: 07/18/2010 |
||||
| Administration Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 11/03/2010 date Of Correction: 12/07/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/03/2010 date Of Correction: 12/07/2010 |
||||
| Pharmacy Service Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 11/03/2010 date Of Correction: 12/07/2010 |
||||
| Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
18.4 % (6.69 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
4.4 % (28.55 % lower than average)
|
vs |
32.95 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
29.8 % (13.14 % higher than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
11 % (1.58 % lower than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
5.9 % (5.93 % lower than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
11.1 % (4.53 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
8.8 % (4.66 % lower than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
2 % (26.38 % lower than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
3.9 % (39.78 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
51.7 % (26.68 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.02 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
86.5 % (1.86 % higher than average)
|
vs |
84.64 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
87 % (3.06 % higher than average)
|
vs |
83.94 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 (29.3 higher than average)
|
vs |
45.90
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
2 % (13.52 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
||
| Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
14.6 % (10.79 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
3.2 % (20.5 % lower than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
29.1 % (15 % higher than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
8 % (1.22 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.1 / 8.8 % | ||||
| Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
31.3 % (12.08 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
10 % (0.65 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 10.7:1 % | ||||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
1.6 % (18.26 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
3.2 % (35.33 % lower than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
2.9 % (7.83 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
48.6 % (23.84 % higher than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
86.2 % (4.76 % higher than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
80.6 % (5.85 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
4.7 % (12.64 % lower than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|
||