MOUNTAIN TOP SENIOR CARE AND REHAB CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	MOUNTAIN TOP	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have MOUNTAIN TOP
State attribute explanation	PA	vs	4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA	compare PA Nursing Homes USA
Street	185 SOUTH MOUNTAIN BOULEVARD
Zip Code	18707
Phone	5704746377
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (1)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (1)
Number of Certified Beds	106 (2.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (106)
Total Number of Residents	102 (10.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (102)
Percent of Occupied Beds	96 % (12.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (96) %
Health Survey Date	5/24/2012
Fire Survey Date	5/14/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	7 (0.48 lower than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	102 (10.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.48 (0.29 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.9 (0.06 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.38 (0.21 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.1 (5.39 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.1 (equals average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 06/23/2011 date Of Correction: 07/15/2011

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Each Resident In A Way That Keeps Or Builds The Resident's Quality Of Life. survey Date: 05/05/2011 date Of Correction: 06/23/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Properly Hold, Secure And Manage Each Resident's Personal Money Which Is Deposited With The Nursing Home. survey Date: 04/22/2011 date Of Correction: 06/20/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 06/23/2011 date Of Correction: 07/15/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Activities To Meet The Interests And Needs Of Each Resident. survey Date: 05/05/2011 date Of Correction: 06/23/2011

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 02/09/2012 date Of Correction: 03/01/2012

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 06/23/2011 date Of Correction: 07/15/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	22.4:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	11.5 % (5.16 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	11.9 % (0.68 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	9 % (2.83 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	56.3 % (11.76 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.3 % (12.33 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	6.3 % (7.16 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	3.8 % (24.58 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.2 % (42.48 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	22.4:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	71.6 % (13.04 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	67.4 % (16.54 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	3.4 % (42.5 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.5 % (13.02 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	21.6 % (3.79 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.4 % (22.3 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	12.7 % (1.4 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	9.4 / 10.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	6.8 % (1.7 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	60.2 % (16.82 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.9 % (5.75 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	6.6 % (2.98 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	6.6 % (13.26 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.8 % (37.73 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2 % (8.73 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	14.5 % (10.26 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	69.1 % (12.34 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	71.1 % (3.65 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	3.2 % (14.14 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %