VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > MT ALVERNA HOME INC

MT ALVERNA HOME INC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
MT ALVERNA HOME INC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PARMA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PARMA
State attribute explanation OH   vs 6.2% Nursing Homes USA have OH
Street 6765 STATE ROAD  
Zip Code 44134  
Phone 4408437800  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(2.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
153  (44.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
150  (58.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
98 % (14.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/12/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/12/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

Staff Information
Number of Residents
150  (58.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.62  (0.15 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.1  (0.26 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.72  (0.13 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (5.41 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.3 % (10.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.9 % (29.05 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9 % (3.58 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.7 % (8.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
60 % (15.46 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5 % (10.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.5 % (7.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.8 % (25.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.4 % (38.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22 % (3.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.4 % (10.76 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.2 % (12.26 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.5 % (11.02 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.6 % (10.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3 % (20.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.5 % (2.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.5 % (2.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.8 % (4.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
53.8 % (10.42 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 % (7.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.7 % (2.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2 % (17.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.4 % (33.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1 % (7.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.2 % (1.56 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92 % (10.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.6 % (19.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 17.1:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved