VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > NATHAN LITTAUER HOSPITAL NURSING

NATHAN LITTAUER HOSPITAL NURSING

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
NATHAN LITTAUER HOSPITAL NURSING VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City GLOVERSVILLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have GLOVERSVILLE
State attribute explanation NY   vs 4.1% Nursing Homes USA have NY
Street 99 EAST STATE STREET  
Zip Code 12078  
Phone 5187735622  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
84  (24.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
81  (10.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
96 % (12.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/8/2012  
Fire Survey Date 6/8/2012  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? Yes  vs 6.4% Nursing Homes USA have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
81  (10.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.79  (0.02 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.84  (equals average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.63  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/11/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/11/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/11/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/11/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/11/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/11/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 04/14/2009
date Of Correction: 05/09/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 04/14/2009
date Of Correction: 05/09/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 04/14/2009
date Of Correction: 05/09/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.9 % (6.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.2 % (29.75 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.3 % (3.36 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.9 % (9.68 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.5 % (0.67 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4 % (14.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.1 % (2.36 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.1 % (1.92 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.8 % (7.16 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
89.8 % (5.86 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 % (14.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19 % (6.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.5 % (21.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15 % (0.9 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.3 % (5.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.4-2413.6-24 % (3.9 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
46.5 % (3.12 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.5 % (7.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.4 % (3.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.3 % (37.23 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.4 % (10.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.9 % (0.86 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.7 % (7.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
87.7 % (12.95 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
8.4 % (8.94 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved