VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > NESS COUNTY HOSPITAL LTCU DBA CEDAR VILLAGE

NESS COUNTY HOSPITAL LTCU DBA CEDAR VILLAGE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
NESS COUNTY HOSPITAL LTCU DBA CEDAR VILLAGE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City NESS CITY   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have NESS CITY
State attribute explanation KS   vs 2.2% Nursing Homes USA have KS
Street 312  
Zip Code 67560  
Phone 7857982291  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
43  (65.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
39  (52.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
91 % (7.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/27/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/27/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - Hospital District  vs 0.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - Hospital district
Located Within a Hospital? Yes  vs 6.4% Nursing Homes USA have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 75.2 % 
Staff Information
Number of Residents
39  (52.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.69  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.17  (0.67 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.86  (0.73 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2  (69.71 higher than average)
vs
5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/18/2012
date Of Correction: 05/16/2012 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/02/2011
date Of Correction: 09/01/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 08/02/2011
date Of Correction: 09/01/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/02/2011
date Of Correction: 09/01/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 01/13/2010
date Of Correction: 01/19/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 08/02/2011
date Of Correction: 09/01/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Review Or Revise The Resident's Care Plan After Any Major Change In A Resident's Physical Or Mental Health.
survey Date: 08/02/2011
date Of Correction: 09/01/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 08/02/2011
date Of Correction: 09/01/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.9 % (3.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.7 % (11.93 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.7 % (11.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.1 % (10.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.1 % (0.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.2 % (0.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.2 % (1.02 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.4 % (1.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder 17.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.7 % (6.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.4 % (2.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
15 % (4.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
29.2 % (18.47 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %



Scroll To Top

saved