VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > NEW LONDON NURSING & REHAB CEN

NEW LONDON NURSING & REHAB CEN

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
NEW LONDON NURSING & REHAB CEN VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City NEW LONDON   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have NEW LONDON
State attribute explanation IA   vs 2.7% Nursing Homes USA have IA
Street 100 CARE CENTER CIRCLE STREET  
Zip Code 52645  
Phone 3193675753  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(2.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
49  (59.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
33  (58.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
67 % (16.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/19/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/25/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 75.2 % 
Staff Information
Number of Residents
33  (58.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.61  (0.16 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.45  (0.39 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.06  (0.53 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (5.47 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/26/2010
date Of Correction: 05/21/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.2 % (2.46 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
12.9 (55.2) % (0.56 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.5 % (9.02 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.2 % (18.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.2 % (9.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.1 % (7.4 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.4 % (2.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.2 % (5.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.7 % (2.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1 % (18.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
40.7 % (29.97 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
31.7 % (6.94 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.7 % (4.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (25.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved