NORTH LAKE REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	LAKE PARK	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have LAKE PARK
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	750 BAYBERRY DRIVE
Zip Code	33403
Phone	5618818144
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	85 (23.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (85)
Total Number of Residents	80 (11.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (80)
Percent of Occupied Beds	94 % (10.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (94) %
Health Survey Date	3/15/2012
Fire Survey Date	3/15/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	8

Staff Information
Number of Residents	80 (11.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.64 (0.13 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.86 (0.02 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.50 (0.09 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.15 (5.34 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.15 (0.05 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 02/13/2012 date Of Correction: 03/07/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 09/13/2011 date Of Correction: 10/12/2011

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Establish And Follow A Written Policy That Permits A Resident To Return To The Nursing Home After Hospitalization. survey Date: 02/13/2012 date Of Correction: 03/07/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed. survey Date: 02/13/2012 date Of Correction: 03/07/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Notify The Resident Or Provide Reasons For A Transfer Or Discharge. survey Date: 02/13/2012 date Of Correction: 03/07/2012

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 07/12/2011 date Of Correction: 08/10/2011

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Or Get X-rays And Other Tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents. survey Date: 07/12/2011 date Of Correction: 08/10/2011

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Menus Meet The Resident's Nutritional Needs And That There Is A Prepared Menu By Which Nutritious Meals Have Been Planned For The Resident And Followed. survey Date: 07/12/2011 date Of Correction: 08/10/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	16.7 % (8.39 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	18 % (1.34 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	9.4 / 10.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	10.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7.2 % (6.26 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	40.5 % (15.48 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	89.1 % (4.46 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	89.1 % (5.16 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.8 % (12.72 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	17.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.7 % (23 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	16.9-24 % (2.8 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.8 % (1.42 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	3.2 % (5.3 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	24.3 % (19.08 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.1 % (9.55 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.1 % (4.48 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.7 % (8.03 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	36.1 % (11.34 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	89.2 % (7.76 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	89.8 % (15.05 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	1.8 % (15.54 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %