VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > NORTHAMPTON REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER

NORTHAMPTON REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
NORTHAMPTON REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Northampton  vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have Northampton
State attribute explanation MA   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MA
Street 737 BRIDGE ROAD  
Zip Code 1060  
Phone 4135863300  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
162  (53.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
111  (19.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
69 % (14.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/16/2010  
Fire Survey Date 11/18/2010  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(54.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(51.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
12  (4.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
111  (19.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.83  (0.06 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.6  (0.01 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (5.46 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 11/16/2010
date Of Correction: 12/21/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/31/2010
date Of Correction: 10/08/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.
survey Date: 07/30/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/21/2010
date Of Correction: 06/04/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 06/10/2011
date Of Correction: 08/12/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/15/2011
date Of Correction: 05/24/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 12/30/2009
date Of Correction: 02/13/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 11/04/2009
date Of Correction: 12/24/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 11/04/2009
date Of Correction: 12/24/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 03/08/2011
date Of Correction: 04/01/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 06/10/2011
date Of Correction: 08/12/2011 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Food In A Way That Meets A Resident's Needs.
survey Date: 04/15/2011
date Of Correction: 05/24/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
(44.9 lower than average)
vs
45.90

Quality Measures Q3
Deficiency #1 1.50 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
40.4 % (15.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.8 % (6.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (65.98 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (66.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.1 % (6.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (65.62 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.8 % (18.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.3 % (32.23 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 % (8.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20 % (4.76 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
10.6 % (64.15 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved