VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > NOTTINGHAM REGIONAL REHAB CENTER

NOTTINGHAM REGIONAL REHAB CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
NOTTINGHAM REGIONAL REHAB CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BATON ROUGE   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have BATON ROUGE
State attribute explanation LA   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have LA
Street 2828 WESTFORK  
Zip Code 70816  
Phone 2252917049  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
176  (67.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
140  (48.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
80 % (3.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/16/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/14/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? Yes  vs 1% Nursing Homes USA have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(51.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
51  (43.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
140  (48.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.1  (0.33 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.96  (0.12 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.06  (0.47 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 05/21/2010
date Of Correction: 06/21/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 05/25/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Clean Bed And Bath Linens That Are In Good Condition.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 05/25/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/24/2010
date Of Correction: 05/05/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/14/2009
date Of Correction: 09/28/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/23/2009
date Of Correction: 05/25/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 12/22/2011
date Of Correction: 02/16/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 05/25/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 12/22/2011
date Of Correction: 02/16/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Give Each Resident A Notice Of Rights, Rules, Services And Charges. Tell Each Resident Who Can Get Medicaid Benefits About 1) Which Items And Services Medicaid Covers And Which The Resident Must Pay For.
survey Date: 03/18/2011
date Of Correction: 05/02/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 05/03/2010
date Of Correction: 05/31/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 05/25/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 05/25/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 05/25/2010 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 05/25/2010 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 11/11/2009
date Of Correction: 12/15/2009 

Deficiency #9 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 08/14/2009
date Of Correction: 09/28/2009 

Deficiency #10 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 04/23/2009
date Of Correction: 05/25/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 12/22/2011
date Of Correction: 02/16/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 12/22/2011
date Of Correction: 02/16/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 05/21/2010
date Of Correction: 06/21/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 05/21/2010
date Of Correction: 06/21/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/21/2010
date Of Correction: 06/21/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 05/21/2010
date Of Correction: 06/21/2010 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 05/21/2010
date Of Correction: 06/21/2010 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 05/03/2010
date Of Correction: 05/31/2010 

Deficiency #9 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 05/03/2010
date Of Correction: 05/31/2010 

Deficiency #10 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/03/2010
date Of Correction: 05/31/2010 

Deficiency #11 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 05/03/2010
date Of Correction: 05/31/2010 

Deficiency #12 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 05/25/2010 

Deficiency #13 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 05/25/2010 

Deficiency #14 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 03/24/2010
date Of Correction: 05/05/2010 

Deficiency #15 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 01/13/2010
date Of Correction: 02/22/2010 

Deficiency #16 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 08/14/2009
date Of Correction: 09/28/2009 

Deficiency #17 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/23/2009
date Of Correction: 05/25/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 03/18/2011
date Of Correction: 05/02/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 03/18/2011
date Of Correction: 05/02/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 12/15/2010
date Of Correction: 02/04/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 05/03/2010
date Of Correction: 05/31/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 05/25/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 05/25/2010 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 04/23/2009
date Of Correction: 05/25/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 12/22/2011
date Of Correction: 02/16/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 12/22/2011
date Of Correction: 02/16/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 05/25/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 05/25/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews.
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 05/25/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/09/2010
date Of Correction: 05/25/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 11/10/2010
date Of Correction: 12/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 05/03/2010
date Of Correction: 05/31/2010 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Menus Meet The Resident's Nutritional Needs And That There Is A Prepared Menu By Which Nutritious Meals Have Been Planned For The Resident And Followed.
survey Date: 12/15/2010
date Of Correction: 02/04/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.3 % (5.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8 % (8.66 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 10.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6 % (5.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42.9 % (1.64 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 % (13.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 12.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.7 % (25.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.5 % (37.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.1 % (15.92 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
47.5 % (37.14 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
44 % (39.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9 % (44 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.3 % (8.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.9 % (3.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.2 % (7.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.5 % (0.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8 % (0.5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.9 % (2.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.7 % (0.12 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.7 % (15.16 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.6 % (34.93 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.1 % (4.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.6 % (4.16 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
51.7 % (29.74 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
42.9 % (31.85 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5 - 2.0 % (16.84 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved