OAKBRIDGE HEALTHCARE CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	LAKELAND	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have LAKELAND
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	3110 OAKBRIDGE BLVD E
Zip Code	33803
Phone	8636484800
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	1 (2.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (1)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	115 (23.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (115)
Percent of Occupied Beds	96 % (12.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (96) %
Health Survey Date	3/2/2012
Fire Survey Date	3/8/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Partnership	vs	7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership	compare For profit - Partnership Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	4 (54.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	4 (52.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	26

Staff Information
Number of Residents	115 (23.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.53 (0.24 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.09 (0.25 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.62 (0.03 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.21 (5.28 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.21 (0.11 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 06/18/2012 date Of Correction: 07/09/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 06/05/2012 date Of Correction: 07/02/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely. survey Date: 03/15/2012 date Of Correction: 04/02/2012
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 03/15/2012 date Of Correction: 04/02/2012
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 01/19/2012 date Of Correction: 02/10/2012

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 08/23/2011 date Of Correction: 09/16/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 08/23/2011 date Of Correction: 09/16/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 06/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/29/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 03/15/2012 date Of Correction: 04/02/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 04/20/2011 date Of Correction: 04/26/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Give Each Resident A Notice Of Rights, Rules, Services And Charges. Tell Each Resident Who Can Get Medicaid Benefits About 1) Which Items And Services Medicaid Covers And Which The Resident Must Pay For. survey Date: 06/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/29/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 04/21/2010 date Of Correction: 05/21/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident. survey Date: 01/28/2010 date Of Correction: 02/26/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Notify The Resident Or Provide Reasons For A Transfer Or Discharge. survey Date: 01/28/2010 date Of Correction: 02/26/2010
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential. survey Date: 01/28/2010 date Of Correction: 02/26/2010
Deficiency #8		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Honor All Of The Resident's Rights As A Resident Of The Nursing Home, Free Of Coercion And Reprisal, And As A Citizen Or Resident Of The United States. survey Date: 01/28/2010 date Of Correction: 02/26/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 06/18/2012 date Of Correction: 07/09/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 03/15/2012 date Of Correction: 04/02/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents With Reduced Range Of Motion Get Proper Treatment And Services To Increase Range Of Motion. survey Date: 04/20/2011 date Of Correction: 04/26/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Prevent A Loss In Range Of Motion Among Residents Who Entered The Nursing Home With A Full Range Of Motion Unless It Was Unavoidable. survey Date: 04/20/2011 date Of Correction: 04/26/2011

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional. survey Date: 04/20/2011 date Of Correction: 04/26/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 04/21/2010 date Of Correction: 05/21/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 01/28/2010 date Of Correction: 02/26/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards. survey Date: 06/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/29/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/29/2010

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 03/15/2012 date Of Correction: 04/02/2012

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	25.4 % (0.31 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.6 / 3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	5 % (11.66 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	17 % (4.42 % higher than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	3.4 % (8.43 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.8 % (12.83 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	15.5 % (2.04 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	3.4 % (40.28 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	26.9 % (1.88 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	97.1 % (12.46 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	97.8 % (13.86 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.4 % (12.12 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	27.1 % (1.71 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2 % (21.7 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	13.4 % (0.7 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	12.7 % (3.48 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7.4 % (1.1 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	12.5 % (30.88 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.5 % (6.15 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	12.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	4.5 % (34.03 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.9 % (6.83 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	25.8 % (1.04 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	96.7 % (15.26 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	98.1 % (23.35 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	11.2-20 % (6.14 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %