VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > OAKMONT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER OF HU

OAKMONT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER OF HU

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
OAKMONT HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER OF HU VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City HUMBLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have HUMBLE
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 8450 WILL CLAYTON PKWY  
Zip Code 77338  
Phone 2814468484  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
134  (25.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
110  (18.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
82 % (1.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/9/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/8/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
110  (18.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.69  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.85  (0.01 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.54  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.55  (4.94 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.55  (0.45 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Dispose Of Garbage And Refuse Properly.
survey Date: 12/16/2010
date Of Correction: 01/25/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 04/20/2011
date Of Correction: 05/19/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/03/2012
date Of Correction: 03/13/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 02/03/2012
date Of Correction: 03/13/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 04/20/2011
date Of Correction: 05/19/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 04/07/2010
date Of Correction: 05/05/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 02/03/2012
date Of Correction: 03/13/2012 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Special Or Therapeutic Diets Are Ordered By The Attending Doctor.
survey Date: 04/07/2010
date Of Correction: 05/05/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.7 % (3.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3 % (30.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.3 % (15.36 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.4 % (7.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7 % (4.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
74.2 % (29.66 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 % (13.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
43.7 % (15.32 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 22.4:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
38.7 % (45.94 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
29.4 % (54.54 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
7.3 % (38.6 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 % (14.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.8 % (10.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3 % (20.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.7 % (9.4 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.2 % (3.02 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.2 % (4.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
66.3 % (22.92 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.8 % (7.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (65.62 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
45.2 % (25.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3 % (9.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.4 % (11.36 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
53.4 % (28.04 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
45.5 % (29.25 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 19.1:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved