OMNI CONTINUING CARE | comparical.com

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

OMNI CONTINUING CARE

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	DETROIT	vs	0.2% Nursing Homes USA have DETROIT
State attribute explanation	MI	vs	2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MI	compare MI Nursing Homes USA
Street	5201
Zip Code	48213
Phone	3135715555
Overall Star Rating	4 (0.89 higher than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (4)
Health Inspections Star Rating	5 (2.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (5)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (1)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (1)
Number of Certified Beds	140 (31.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (140)
Total Number of Residents	134 (42.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (134)
Percent of Occupied Beds	96 % (12.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (96) %
Health Survey Date	2/3/2012
Fire Survey Date	2/3/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	14 (6.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	134 (42.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.31 (0.46 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.15 (0.69 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.46 (1.13 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.07 (5.42 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.07 (0.03 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 04/05/2010 date Of Correction: 05/06/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 06/30/2009 date Of Correction: 09/16/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 04/05/2010 date Of Correction: 05/06/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 06/30/2009 date Of Correction: 09/16/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 06/30/2009 date Of Correction: 09/16/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment. survey Date: 06/30/2009 date Of Correction: 09/16/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 06/30/2009 date Of Correction: 09/16/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 04/05/2010 date Of Correction: 05/06/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 06/30/2009 date Of Correction: 09/16/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 06/30/2009 date Of Correction: 09/16/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/30/2009 date Of Correction: 09/16/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 06/30/2009 date Of Correction: 09/16/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 06/30/2009 date Of Correction: 09/16/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/30/2009 date Of Correction: 09/16/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	15.9:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	3 % (29.95 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	14.9-28 % (1.76 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	22.8 % (10.22 % higher than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	2.5 % (9.33 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	10 % (5.63 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.8 % (7.66 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.2 % (27.18 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	4.1 % (39.58 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	14.7:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	30.4 % (54.24 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	29.1 % (54.84 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	16.9-24 % (8.49 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	3 % (20.7 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	8.2 % (5.9 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	26 % (16.78 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4.7 % (3.8 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	33.3 % (10.08 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	8.4 % (2.25 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.9 % (3.68 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	0.4 % (19.46 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.9 % (35.63 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	0.3 % (10.43 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	20.2 (68.4) % (4.56 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	31.1 % (50.34 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	35.9 % (38.85 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	13 % (4.34 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %