ORCHARD GROVE SPECIALTY CARE CENTER, LLC

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	UNCASVILLE	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have UNCASVILLE
State attribute explanation	CT	vs	1.5% Nursing Homes USA have CT	compare CT Nursing Homes USA
Street	5 RICHARD BROWN DRIVE
Zip Code	6382
Phone	8608488466
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	130 (21.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (130)
Total Number of Residents	116 (24.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (116)
Percent of Occupied Beds	89 % (5.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (89) %
Health Survey Date	12/15/2011
Fire Survey Date	12/19/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Individual	vs	3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual	compare For profit - Individual Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	17

Staff Information
Number of Residents	116 (24.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.54 (0.23 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.77 (0.07 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.32 (0.27 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.04 (5.45 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.04 (0.06 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 12/15/2011 date Of Correction: 03/01/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 06/11/2010 date Of Correction: 07/23/2010

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 12/15/2011 date Of Correction: 03/01/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 06/11/2010 date Of Correction: 07/23/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 06/11/2010 date Of Correction: 07/23/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 08/06/2009 date Of Correction: 09/17/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 12/15/2011 date Of Correction: 03/01/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 10/07/2010 date Of Correction: 11/18/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 06/11/2010 date Of Correction: 07/23/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/11/2010 date Of Correction: 07/23/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 06/11/2010 date Of Correction: 07/23/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 08/06/2009 date Of Correction: 09/17/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 06/11/2010 date Of Correction: 07/23/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 06/11/2010 date Of Correction: 07/23/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 12/15/2011 date Of Correction: 03/01/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards. survey Date: 06/11/2010 date Of Correction: 07/23/2010

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 06/11/2010 date Of Correction: 07/23/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	31.5 % (6.41 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	4 % (28.95 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	18.8 % (2.14 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	4.9 % (7.68 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.2 % (6.63 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	63.5 % (18.96 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.2 % (12.43 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	3.1 % (10.36 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.1 % (27.28 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	31 % (5.98 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	72 % (12.64 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	63.9 % (20.04 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	4.9 % (41 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	5.2 % (10.32 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	27.2 % (1.81 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	3 % (20.7 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	20.3 % (6.2 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.6 % (1.62 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7 % (1.5 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	67.1 % (23.72 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.4 % (7.25 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	4 % (5.58 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.7 % (18.16 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.6 % (7.13 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	31.3 % (6.54 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	62.7 % (18.74 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	50 % (24.75 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	28.3 % (10.96 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %