VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ORCHARD PARK CARE CENTER

ORCHARD PARK CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ORCHARD PARK CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City OREM   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have OREM
State attribute explanation UT   vs 0.6% Nursing Homes USA have UT
Street 740 NORTH 300 EAST  
Zip Code 84057  
Phone 8012240921  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
89  (19.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
51  (40.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
57 % (26.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/2/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/2/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
51  (40.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.19  (1.42 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.49  (0.35 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.68  (1.09 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.27  (5.22 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.27  (0.17 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 02/02/2012
date Of Correction: 02/10/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 02/02/2012
date Of Correction: 02/10/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 04/08/2010
date Of Correction: 06/08/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 02/02/2012
date Of Correction: 02/10/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 04/08/2010
date Of Correction: 06/08/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 02/02/2012
date Of Correction: 02/10/2012 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Post Nurse Staffing Information/data On A Daily Basis.
survey Date: 02/02/2012
date Of Correction: 02/10/2012 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 02/02/2012
date Of Correction: 02/10/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.4 % (13.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.5 % (6.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.5 % (6.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (12.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.3 % (20.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27 % (1.98 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.9 % (14.96 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4 % (41.9 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
8.3 % (7.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 11.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0 % (23.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.8 % (3.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.3 % (5.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1 % (7.5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
60.4 % (17.02 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.4 % (6.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (65.62 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.7 % (14.16 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.6 % (4.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.5 % (0.26 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99 % (24.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
7.7 % (9.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved