VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > OREM REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER

OREM REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
OREM REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City OREM   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have OREM
State attribute explanation UT   vs 0.6% Nursing Homes USA have UT
Street 575 EAST 1400 SOUTH  
Zip Code 84058  
Phone 8012254741  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
76  (15.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
63 % (20.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/16/2010  
Fire Survey Date 12/15/2010  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(55.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(53.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
76  (15.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.3  (0.53 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.49  (0.35 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.79  (0.2 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (5.41 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 04/19/2011
date Of Correction: 05/10/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 12/16/2010
date Of Correction: 01/28/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/12/2011
date Of Correction: 09/23/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 11/04/2010
date Of Correction: 12/01/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Train All Employees On What To Do In An Emergency, And Carry Out Announced Staff Drills.
survey Date: 09/12/2011
date Of Correction: 09/23/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.
survey Date: 11/04/2010
date Of Correction: 12/01/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 12/16/2010
date Of Correction: 02/21/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.8 % (15.29 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22 % (5.34 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.3 % (6.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.7 % (7.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2 % (13.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.3 % (11.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
34.9 % (6.52 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37 % (11.98 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.3 % (5.34 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
86.7 % (2.76 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4 % (11.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.3 % (19.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 % (22.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.9 % (11.8 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.5 % (4.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.3 % (3.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
46.3 % (2.92 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.3 % (7.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3 % (6.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
32.5 % (12.64 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.9 % (36.63 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7 % (5.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.6 % (9.84 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.6 % (11.84 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
87.1 % (12.35 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
12.7 % (4.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved