ORLANDO HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	ORLANDO	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have ORLANDO
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	830 W 29TH STREET
Zip Code	32805
Phone	4078433230
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	420 (311.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (420)
Total Number of Residents	360 (268.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (360)
Percent of Occupied Beds	86 % (2.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (86) %
Health Survey Date	3/23/2012
Fire Survey Date	3/20/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Non Profit - Corporation	vs	18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation	compare Non profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	17

Staff Information
Number of Residents	360 (268.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.69 (0.08 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.69 (0.15 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.39 (0.2 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.11 (5.38 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.11 (0.01 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 09/21/2010 date Of Correction: 10/28/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 09/09/2009 date Of Correction: 10/12/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 07/09/2009 date Of Correction: 08/12/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 06/27/2012 date Of Correction: 07/27/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident. survey Date: 11/22/2011 date Of Correction: 12/28/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident. survey Date: 12/03/2009 date Of Correction: 01/11/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 06/03/2009 date Of Correction: 07/07/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 09/21/2010 date Of Correction: 10/28/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 09/21/2010 date Of Correction: 10/28/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 09/09/2009 date Of Correction: 10/12/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 09/01/2009 date Of Correction: 10/12/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 09/01/2009 date Of Correction: 10/12/2009
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 07/09/2009 date Of Correction: 08/12/2009
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/03/2009 date Of Correction: 07/07/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 09/01/2009 date Of Correction: 10/12/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That A Doctor Approves A Resident's Admission In Writing And That Each Resident Remains Under The Care Of A Doctor. survey Date: 06/03/2009 date Of Correction: 07/07/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: At Least Once A Month, Have A Licensed Pharmacist Review Each Resident's Medication(s) And Report Any Irregularities To The Attending Doctor. survey Date: 06/03/2009 date Of Correction: 07/07/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	20.8 % (4.29 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2 % (30.95 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	5.7 % (10.96 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.3 % (5.28 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	50.9 % (6.36 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.3 % (13.33 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	6.8 % (6.66 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	2.8 % (25.58 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	5.2 % (38.48 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	31.7 % (6.68 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	52.7 % (31.94 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	55.8 % (28.14 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	0.6 % (14.92 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	23.1 % (2.29 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.3 % (21.4 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	5.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6.9 % (2.32 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7.1 % (1.4 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	50.7 % (7.32 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.7 % (7.95 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	6 % (3.58 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	2.3 % (17.56 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	4.8 % (33.73 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1 % (9.73 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	26.8 % (2.04 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	54.2 % (27.24 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	63.6 % (11.15 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	9.9:1 %