VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > OSPREY RIDGE HEALTHCARE AND RE

OSPREY RIDGE HEALTHCARE AND RE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
OSPREY RIDGE HEALTHCARE AND RE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CARBONDALE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have CARBONDALE
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 45 NORTH SCOTT STREET  
Zip Code 18407  
Phone 5702821099  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
81  (27.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
75  (16.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
93 % (9.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/1/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/14/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
12  (4.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
72  (19.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.73  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.9  (0.06 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.63  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (5.41 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/18/2011
date Of Correction: 10/17/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 08/18/2011
date Of Correction: 10/17/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 04/16/2012
date Of Correction: 06/19/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/16/2012
date Of Correction: 06/19/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Specialized Rehabilitative Services Per The Patient's Assessment Or Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 03/17/2011
date Of Correction: 05/02/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 09/16/2009
date Of Correction: 10/09/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 09/16/2009
date Of Correction: 10/09/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 09/16/2009
date Of Correction: 10/09/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 08/18/2011
date Of Correction: 10/17/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 08/18/2011
date Of Correction: 10/17/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Ensure The Activities Program Is Directed By A Qualified Professional.
survey Date: 04/15/2011
date Of Correction: 05/02/2011 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 03/17/2011
date Of Correction: 05/02/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
38.5 % (13.41 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.7 % (28.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.1 % (2.56 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.7 % (0.12 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.6-28 % (1.77 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.9 % (10.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6 % (7.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 11.8:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.8 % (10.22 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
21.6 % (63.04 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
67.6 % (16.34 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.50 % (14.02 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
39.8 % (14.41 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.5 % (21.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.9 % (6.8 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.5 % (1.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
17.2 % (8.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.8 % (17.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.3 % (3.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9 % (6.68 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.5 - 2.0 % (19.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
10.5 % (28.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 % (9.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.6 % (9.84 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
40 % (41.44 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
56.5 % (18.25 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
31.5 % (14.16 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved