VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PACIFIC REHABILITATION & WELLNESS CENTER, LP

PACIFIC REHABILITATION & WELLNESS CENTER, LP

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PACIFIC REHABILITATION & WELLNESS CENTER, LP VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Eureka  vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have Eureka
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 2211 HARRISON AVENUE  
Zip Code 95501  
Phone 7074439767  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
60  (48.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
52  (39.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
87 % (3.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/17/2011  
Fire Survey Date 6/29/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 6  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
52  (39.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.23  (0.46 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.36  (0.48 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.58  (0.01 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (5.39 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (equals average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/21/2012
date Of Correction: 05/04/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 11/27/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 08/26/2009
date Of Correction: 04/05/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 03/21/2012
date Of Correction: 05/04/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 08/26/2009
date Of Correction: 04/05/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/21/2012
date Of Correction: 05/04/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25 % (0.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 % (31.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.1 % (6.48 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.4 % (12.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
19 % (9.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.8 % (38.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
51.6 % (26.58 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
44.6 % (40.04 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
33.3 % (50.64 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4 % (13.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.7 (72.9) % (2.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 % (22.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.3 % (14.2 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.6 % (4.62 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.2 % (1.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.5 % (1.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.8 % (6.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.8 % (7.78 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.9 % (7.96 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.7 % (36.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (9.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
30.8 % (6.04 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
43.3 % (38.14 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
31.3 % (43.45 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 12.6:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved