VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PALM CITY NURSING & REHAB CENTER

PALM CITY NURSING & REHAB CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PALM CITY NURSING & REHAB CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PALM CITY   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PALM CITY
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 2505 SW MARTIN HWY  
Zip Code 34990  
Phone 7722880060  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
109  (17.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
91 % (7.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/25/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/24/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 9  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
109  (17.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.69  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.98  (0.14 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.67  (0.08 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.18  (5.31 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.18  (0.08 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged.
survey Date: 05/23/2012
date Of Correction: 06/25/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 07/29/2010
date Of Correction: 08/29/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 03/05/2012
date Of Correction: 03/28/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 11/15/2011
date Of Correction: 12/12/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 10/21/2011
date Of Correction: 12/02/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/01/2010
date Of Correction: 07/29/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 04/29/2010
date Of Correction: 05/30/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That Doctors Visit Residents Regularly, As Required.
survey Date: 12/22/2010
date Of Correction: 01/22/2011 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 11/15/2011
date Of Correction: 12/12/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.4 % (5.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 % (31.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16 % (0.66 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10 % (2.58 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
18.8 % (6.97 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
35.5 % (9.04 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 % (13.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.5 % (10.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.6 % (24.78 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
35.4 % (10.38 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
54.4 % (30.24 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
51.7 % (32.24 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.7 % (42.2 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2 % (14.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.1 % (6.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.8 % (22.9 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.4 % (4.3 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.8 % (1.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.6-28 % (5.1 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.1 % (6.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 % (8.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.3 % (8.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.1 % (17.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3 % (9.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37.1 % (12.34 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
45.7 % (35.74 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
39.7 % (35.05 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
10.8 % (6.54 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved