PALM TERRACE OF ST PETERSBURG

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	SAINT PETERSBURG	vs	0.2% Nursing Homes USA have SAINT PETERSBURG
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	521 69TH AVE N
Zip Code	33702
Phone	7275267000
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	96 (12.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (96)
Total Number of Residents	78 (13.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (78)
Percent of Occupied Beds	81 % (2.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (81) %
Health Survey Date	6/13/2012
Fire Survey Date	6/11/2012
Sprinkler Status	Not Sprinklered	vs	1.1% Nursing Homes USA have Not Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	1 (57.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	1 (55.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	18

Staff Information
Number of Residents	78 (13.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.79 (0.02 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.93 (0.09 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.73 (0.14 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.07 (5.42 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.07 (0.03 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 12/15/2011 date Of Correction: 01/02/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 03/16/2011 date Of Correction: 04/16/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 11/05/2010 date Of Correction: 12/05/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 08/10/2010 date Of Correction: 09/10/2010

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 06/29/2010 date Of Correction: 07/01/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 06/29/2010 date Of Correction: 07/01/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 06/29/2010 date Of Correction: 07/01/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly. survey Date: 06/29/2010 date Of Correction: 07/01/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 11/09/2011 date Of Correction: 11/28/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 03/16/2011 date Of Correction: 04/16/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 03/16/2011 date Of Correction: 04/16/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 08/10/2010 date Of Correction: 09/10/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 08/10/2010 date Of Correction: 09/10/2010

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 11/09/2011 date Of Correction: 11/28/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Doctors Orders For The Resident's Immediate Care, At The Time The Resident Was Admitted. survey Date: 11/09/2011 date Of Correction: 11/28/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 06/29/2010 date Of Correction: 07/01/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 03/16/2011 date Of Correction: 04/16/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/29/2010 date Of Correction: 07/01/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	33.3 % (8.21 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	18.2:1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.3:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7 % (4.83 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	19.4:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.1 % (11.53 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	4.2 % (9.26 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	8.5 % (19.88 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	11.1 % (32.58 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	23.1 % (1.92 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	59 % (25.64 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	59.4 % (24.54 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	31.4 (88.5) % (6.01 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.3 % (21.4 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	14.3 % (0.2 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	18.7 % (9.48 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4.3 % (4.2 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	26.4 % (16.98 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.4 % (6.25 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.8 % (3.78 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	7.1 % (12.76 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	10.9 % (27.63 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.4 % (9.33 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	25 % (0.24 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	71.7 % (9.74 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	76.9 % (2.15 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	7.9:1 %