VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PALOS HILLS HEALTHCARE

PALOS HILLS HEALTHCARE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PALOS HILLS HEALTHCARE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PALOS HILLS   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PALOS HILLS
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 10426 SOUTH ROBERTS  
Zip Code 60465  
Phone 7085983460  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
177  (68.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
139  (47.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
79 % (4.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/5/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/15/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
10  (2.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
140  (48.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.46  (0.31 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.79  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.24  (0.35 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 04/23/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 04/23/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/27/2012 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 07/23/2010
date Of Correction: 08/06/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 04/23/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 04/23/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 07/23/2010
date Of Correction: 08/06/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 07/02/2010
date Of Correction: 07/12/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 04/23/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 07/02/2010
date Of Correction: 07/12/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33 % (7.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.5 % (30.45 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.7 % (12.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.8 % (2.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.9 % (0.07 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder 17.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.1 % (11.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1 % (10.36 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 12.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.4 % (14.62 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
9.8 % (74.84 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
6 % (77.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.2 % (41.7 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1 % (12.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
34.3 % (8.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.3 % (19.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6 % (8.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.7 % (0.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.4 % (2.9 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.6 (65.5) % (24.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.8 % (5.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6 % (7.98 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.9 % (8.96 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.7 % (11.06 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
9 % (72.44 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
3.3 % (71.45 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
19.2 % (1.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved