VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PARHAM HEALTH CARE & REHAB CEN

PARHAM HEALTH CARE & REHAB CEN

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PARHAM HEALTH CARE & REHAB CEN VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Richmond  vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have Richmond
State attribute explanation VA   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have VA
Street 2400 E PARHAM ROAD  
Zip Code 23228  
Phone 8042649185  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
180  (71.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
152  (60.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
84 % (0.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/9/2011  
Fire Survey Date 6/22/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
24  (16.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
152  (60.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.51  (0.26 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.34  (0.5 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.85  (0.26 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/09/2011
date Of Correction: 07/01/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 06/09/2011
date Of Correction: 06/02/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 06/25/2009
date Of Correction: 08/03/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Each Resident A Notice Of Rights, Rules, Services And Charges. Tell Each Resident Who Can Get Medicaid Benefits About 1) Which Items And Services Medicaid Covers And Which The Resident Must Pay For.
survey Date: 06/09/2011
date Of Correction: 07/01/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Let The Resident Or The Resident's Legal Representative The Right To Access Or Purchase Copies Of All Records.
survey Date: 06/09/2011
date Of Correction: 07/01/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Each Resident In A Way That Keeps Or Builds The Resident's Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 07/26/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 11/02/2011
date Of Correction: 11/11/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Specialized Rehabilitative Services Per The Patient's Assessment Or Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 06/09/2011
date Of Correction: 07/01/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/16/2010
date Of Correction: 09/25/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 09/16/2010
date Of Correction: 09/25/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible.
survey Date: 07/26/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give The Right Treatment And Services To Residents Who Have Mental Or Psychosocial Problems Adjusting.
survey Date: 07/26/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/26/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Residents' Abilities In Activities Of Daily Living Do Not Decline, Unless Unavoidable.
survey Date: 06/25/2009
date Of Correction: 08/03/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 06/09/2011
date Of Correction: 07/01/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 06/25/2009
date Of Correction: 08/03/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 11/02/2011
date Of Correction: 11/11/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.
survey Date: 06/09/2011
date Of Correction: 07/01/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/25/2009
date Of Correction: 08/03/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 09/16/2010
date Of Correction: 09/25/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 09/16/2010
date Of Correction: 09/25/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 07/26/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 07/26/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 06/25/2009
date Of Correction: 08/03/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.4 % (1.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.7 % (32.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.7 % (6.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1 % (6.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
66.1 % (21.56 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.8 % (10.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9 % (10.56 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.9 % (2.12 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.2 % (13.56 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.1 % (15.16 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.50 % (14.02 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.6 % (4.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.20 % (21.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.7 % (4.4 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.3 % (2.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1 % (1.4 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
59.5 % (16.12 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5 % (5.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.5 % (7.08 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2 % (9.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.3 % (1.46 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.3 % (15.86 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.1 % (22.35 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.8 % (14.54 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved