VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PARK MANOR OF HUMBLE

PARK MANOR OF HUMBLE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PARK MANOR OF HUMBLE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City HUMBLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have HUMBLE
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 19424 MCKAY DR  
Zip Code 77338  
Phone 2813194060  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
125  (16.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
98  (6.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
78 % (5.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/6/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/6/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
98  (6.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.37  (0.4 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.89  (0.05 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.26  (0.33 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/10/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.
survey Date: 09/22/2011
date Of Correction: 10/06/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 12/16/2011
date Of Correction: 01/14/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 10/28/2010
date Of Correction: 11/18/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 02/16/2010
date Of Correction: 03/12/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.
survey Date: 07/22/2010
date Of Correction: 08/09/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 02/16/2010
date Of Correction: 03/12/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.9 % (7.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0 % (32.45 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.50 % (15.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.7 % (6.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.9 % (7.93 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
52.5 % (7.96 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.3 % (14.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.9 % (9.56 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
13.3 % (15.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.6 % (14.42 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.4 % (9.76 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.4 % (11.46 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.1 % (43.8 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.9 % (2.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.4 % (23.3 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.3 % (8.8 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.3 % (0.08 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.7 % (6.8 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
50 % (6.62 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.7 % (7.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.4 % (4.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.5 % (10.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2 % (9.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.7 % (13.06 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.4 % (5.04 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
83.4 % (8.65 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
28.8 % (11.46 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved