VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PARK PLACE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER

PARK PLACE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PARK PLACE NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City TYLER   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have TYLER
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 2450 E FIFTH ST  
Zip Code 75701  
Phone 9035926745  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
81  (10.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
68 % (15.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/11/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/10/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(4.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
81  (10.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.26  (0.51 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.16  (0.32 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.42  (0.17 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 10/05/2011
date Of Correction: 11/04/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 10/05/2011
date Of Correction: 11/04/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 01/12/2011
date Of Correction: 02/25/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.4 % (3.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.9 % (31.05 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.5 % (10.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.9 % (10.68 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.9 % (7.93 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
50 % (5.46 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.6 % (8.03 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
16.9-24 % (3.44 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16 % (12.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.9 % (6.12 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.2 % (2.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.4 % (23.3 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.8 % (6.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.4 % (4.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5 % (3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.3 % (7.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.8 % (6.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13 % (3.42 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.4 % (10.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.9 % (12.86 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.3 % (5.86 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.8 % (14.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.5 % (13.84 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved