Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
PARK VILLA | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
29 (62.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.56 (0.21 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.76 (0.08 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.32 (0.27 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.1 (5.39 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.1 (equals average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 04/26/2011 date Of Correction: 05/25/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 04/26/2011 date Of Correction: 05/25/2011 |
Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 04/26/2011 date Of Correction: 05/25/2011 |
Resident Assessment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 04/26/2011 date Of Correction: 05/25/2011 |
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 04/26/2011 date Of Correction: 05/25/2011 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 (29.3 higher than average)
|
vs |
45.90
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 | 41.7 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
20.3 % (5.09 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
20.4 % (6.3 % higher than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
2.5 % (6.72 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
2.7 % (5.8 % lower than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
20 % (23.38 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder | 10.7:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
6.8 % (2.78 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
9.1 % (10.76 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 2.6 / 3 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
7.8 % (2.93 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|