PAYETTE CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	PAYETTE	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have PAYETTE
State attribute explanation	ID	vs	0.6% Nursing Homes USA have ID	compare ID Nursing Homes USA
Street	1019 3RD AVENUE SOUTH
Zip Code	83661
Phone	2086424455
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	80 (28.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (80)
Total Number of Residents	36 (55.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (36)
Percent of Occupied Beds	45 % (38.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (45) %
Health Survey Date	12/15/2011
Fire Survey Date	1/31/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	15

Staff Information
Number of Residents	36 (55.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.98 (0.21 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.5 - 2.0 (0.34 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.48 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.01 (5.48 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.01 (0.09 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 05/20/2010 date Of Correction: 06/09/2010

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 08/02/2011 date Of Correction: 08/22/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 04/28/2009 date Of Correction: 06/01/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential. survey Date: 10/13/2011 date Of Correction: 11/07/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged. survey Date: 05/20/2010 date Of Correction: 06/09/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Help And Prepare Each Resident For A Safe And Easy Discharge And Transfer From The Nursing Home. survey Date: 04/28/2009 date Of Correction: 06/01/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 05/15/2012 date Of Correction: 06/08/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 10/13/2011 date Of Correction: 11/07/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 09/01/2010 date Of Correction: 09/26/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 09/01/2010 date Of Correction: 09/26/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 05/20/2010 date Of Correction: 06/09/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 09/24/2009 date Of Correction: 10/23/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 09/01/2010 date Of Correction: 09/26/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 04/28/2009 date Of Correction: 06/01/2009

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature. survey Date: 05/20/2010 date Of Correction: 06/09/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	26.7 % (1.61 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	13.3 % (1.47 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	11 % (4.63 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	3.3 % (10.16 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	38.7 % (10.32 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	18.5 % (6.52 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	70.1 % (14.54 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	73.6 % (10.34 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	6.1 % (39.8 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	6.5 % (9.02 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	31.8 % (6.41 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.7 % (23 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	32.4 (90.3) % (18.3 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	2.7 % (6.52 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	13.8 % (5.3 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	43.5 % (0.12 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	10.3:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	3.4 % (6.18 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	24.4 % (4.54 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	4.3 % (6.43 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	26.2 % (1.44 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	68.6 % (12.84 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	72.4 % (2.35 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	26.2 % (8.86 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %