PAYSON CARE CENTER | comparical.com

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

PAYSON CARE CENTER

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	PAYSON	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have PAYSON
State attribute explanation	AZ	vs	0.9% Nursing Homes USA have AZ	compare AZ Nursing Homes USA
Street	107 EAST LONE PINE DRIVE
Zip Code	85541
Phone	9284746896
Overall Star Rating	3 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (3)
Health Inspections Star Rating	3 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (3)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	163 (54.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (163)
Total Number of Residents	90 (1.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (90)
Percent of Occupied Beds	55 % (28.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (55) %
Health Survey Date	7/21/2011
Fire Survey Date	7/27/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	22

Staff Information
Number of Residents	90 (1.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.75 (0.02 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.9 (0.06 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.64 (0.05 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.15 (5.34 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.15 (0.05 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 07/21/2011 date Of Correction: 08/15/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 07/21/2011 date Of Correction: 08/15/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves. survey Date: 07/21/2011 date Of Correction: 08/15/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Activities To Meet The Interests And Needs Of Each Resident. survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional. survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 07/21/2011 date Of Correction: 08/15/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 07/21/2011 date Of Correction: 08/15/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards. survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way. survey Date: 07/21/2011 date Of Correction: 08/15/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way. survey Date: 05/04/2010 date Of Correction: 06/18/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	33.8 % (8.71 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	40.7 % (24.04 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	15.4 % (2.82 % higher than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	13.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	6 % (9.63 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	6.6 % (6.86 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	14.3 % (14.08 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	49.6 % (24.58 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	87.1 % (2.46 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	89.4 % (5.46 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	6.2 % (9.32 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	36.7 % (11.31 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	34.1 % (20 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	9.5 % (0.28 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	11.3 % (2.8 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	22.2:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5.8 % (4.85 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7.8 % (1.78 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	14.9-28 % (4.96 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	5.7 % (5.03 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	45 % (20.24 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	84.6 % (3.16 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	90.9 % (16.15 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	20.2 (68.4) % (2.86 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %