VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PEARL STREET HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

PEARL STREET HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PEARL STREET HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City ENGLEWOOD   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have ENGLEWOOD
State attribute explanation CO   vs 1.3% Nursing Homes USA have CO
Street 3636 SOUTH PEARL STREET  
Zip Code 80110  
Phone 3037611640  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
81  (27.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
56  (35.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
69 % (14.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/14/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/9/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 23  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
56  (35.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.82  (0.05 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.74  (0.1 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.56  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (5.39 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (equals average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/26/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/26/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Comfortable And Safe Temperature Levels.
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/20/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/20/2012 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/30/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/20/2012 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/26/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/06/2012
date Of Correction: 07/13/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 06/06/2012
date Of Correction: 07/13/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/26/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/26/2012 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves.
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/20/2012 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/26/2012 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/30/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 08/30/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/26/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/26/2012 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 06/06/2012
date Of Correction: 07/13/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/20/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/26/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/26/2012 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 08/30/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature.
survey Date: 02/14/2012
date Of Correction: 03/20/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.9 % (14.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3 % (31.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (62.62 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.7 % (3.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
64.5 % (19.96 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.3 % (8.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.3 % (9.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.4 % (21.98 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.1 % (41.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25 % (0.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81 % (3.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.3 % (4.64 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 % (13.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 9.4 / 10.4 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.6 % (19.1 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.4 % (10.3 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (65.98 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7 % (1.5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
66.7 % (23.32 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.9 % (6.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.9 % (4.68 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.5 % (16.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.7 % (37.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.2 % (6.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.6 % (3.84 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.5 % (2.06 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
77.3 % (2.55 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
13 % (4.34 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved