Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
PECOS NURSING HOME | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
65 (26.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.32 (0.45 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.65 (0.19 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.97 (0.62 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
75.2 (69.71 higher than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 03/08/2012 date Of Correction: 04/02/2012 |
Mistreatment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 02/09/2010 date Of Correction: 02/26/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 02/09/2010 date Of Correction: 02/26/2010 |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 02/09/2010 date Of Correction: 02/26/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 02/09/2010 date Of Correction: 02/26/2010 |
Administration Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 02/09/2010 date Of Correction: 02/26/2010 |
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 06/04/2010 date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
21.5 % (3.59 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
15.4 % (2.82 % higher than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 15.9:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
5.2 % (10.43 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
1.6 % (11.86 % lower than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
19 % (9.38 % lower than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
1.4 % (42.28 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
4.3 % (11.22 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication | 21.2:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
75.2 % (61.1 % higher than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
14.4 % (5.18 % higher than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.6:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
40.7 % (2.68 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
5.5 % (5.15 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
3.2 % (6.38 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
21.5 % (1.64 % higher than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
1 % (37.53 % lower than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
23.4 % (12.67 % higher than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
3.4 % (21.36 % lower than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
94.6 % (13.16 % higher than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
89.5 % (14.75 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
5 % (12.34 % lower than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|