VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PECOS NURSING HOME

PECOS NURSING HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PECOS NURSING HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City PECOS   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PECOS
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 1819 MEMORIAL DR  
Zip Code 79772  
Phone 4324472183  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
89  (19.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
65  (26.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
73 % (10.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/19/2011  
Fire Survey Date 5/24/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Individual  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
65  (26.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.32  (0.45 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.65  (0.19 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.97  (0.62 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2  (69.71 higher than average)
vs
5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/08/2012
date Of Correction: 04/02/2012 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 02/09/2010
date Of Correction: 02/26/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 02/09/2010
date Of Correction: 02/26/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/09/2010
date Of Correction: 02/26/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 02/09/2010
date Of Correction: 02/26/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/09/2010
date Of Correction: 02/26/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 06/04/2010
date Of Correction: 07/09/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.5 % (3.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
15.4 % (2.82 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 15.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.2 % (10.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6 % (11.86 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
19 % (9.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.4 % (42.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3 % (11.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 21.2:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (61.1 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14.4 % (5.18 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.7 % (2.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.5 % (5.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2 % (6.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
21.5 % (1.64 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1 % (37.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
23.4 % (12.67 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.4 % (21.36 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.6 % (13.16 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
89.5 % (14.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5 % (12.34 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved