PIEDMONT GARDENS | comparical.com

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

PIEDMONT GARDENS

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	OAKLAND	vs	0.2% Nursing Homes USA have OAKLAND
State attribute explanation	CA	vs	7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street	110 41ST STREET
Zip Code	94611
Phone	5106547172
Overall Star Rating	3 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (3)
Health Inspections Star Rating	3 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (3)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	94 (14.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (94)
Total Number of Residents	65 (26.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (65)
Percent of Occupied Beds	69 % (14.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (69) %
Health Survey Date	9/23/2011
Fire Survey Date	9/15/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Non Profit - Corporation	vs	18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation	compare Non profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	Yes	vs	9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	20

Staff Information
Number of Residents	65 (26.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.86 (0.09 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.18 (0.66 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.04 (0.55 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.22 (5.27 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.22 (0.12 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 09/23/2011 date Of Correction: 11/01/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 09/23/2011 date Of Correction: 11/01/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 09/23/2011 date Of Correction: 11/01/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 09/23/2011 date Of Correction: 11/01/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 09/23/2011 date Of Correction: 11/01/2011

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 04/16/2009 date Of Correction: 05/22/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 04/16/2009 date Of Correction: 05/22/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 04/16/2009 date Of Correction: 05/22/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 04/16/2009 date Of Correction: 05/22/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 04/16/2009 date Of Correction: 05/22/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 04/16/2009 date Of Correction: 05/22/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 04/16/2009 date Of Correction: 05/22/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 04/16/2009 date Of Correction: 05/22/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 04/16/2009 date Of Correction: 05/22/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 04/16/2009 date Of Correction: 05/22/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 02/21/2012 date Of Correction: 03/14/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 02/21/2012 date Of Correction: 03/14/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 02/21/2012 date Of Correction: 03/14/2012
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 02/21/2012 date Of Correction: 03/14/2012
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 02/21/2012 date Of Correction: 03/14/2012

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	26.4 % (1.31 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.3 % (30.65 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	19.9 % (3.24 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	2.6 / 3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	14 % (2.17 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.8 % (12.83 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7.7 % (5.76 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	5.7 % (22.68 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	20.4 % (4.62 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	89.1 % (4.46 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	91.3 % (7.36 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	3.7 % (42.2 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	21.8 % (3.59 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2 % (21.7 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	19.2 % (5.1 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6.4 % (2.82 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	11.2-20 % (2.7 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	58.3 % (14.92 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.3 % (8.35 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.8 % (3.78 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	7.9:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.3 % (37.23 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	23.7 (74.7) % (1.06 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	89.7 % (8.26 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	92.4 % (17.65 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	21.8 % (4.46 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %