VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PINCKNEYVILLE HEALTH CARE CTR

PINCKNEYVILLE HEALTH CARE CTR

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PINCKNEYVILLE HEALTH CARE CTR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City PINCKNEYVILLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PINCKNEYVILLE
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 708 VIRGINIA COURT  
Zip Code 62274  
Phone 6183572493  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
60  (48.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
38  (53.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
63 % (20.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/10/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/8/2012  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
10  (2.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
38  (53.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15  (0.62 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.63  (0.21 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.78  (0.81 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 11/17/2011
date Of Correction: 11/18/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 11/17/2011
date Of Correction: 11/18/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 11/17/2011
date Of Correction: 11/18/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 01/14/2010
date Of Correction: 02/05/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 11/17/2011
date Of Correction: 11/18/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 01/14/2010
date Of Correction: 02/05/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 11/17/2011
date Of Correction: 11/18/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Choose A Doctor To Serve As The Medical Director To Create Resident Care Policies And Coordinate Medical Care In The Facility.
survey Date: 11/17/2011
date Of Correction: 11/18/2011 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 11/17/2011
date Of Correction: 11/18/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 06/08/2010
date Of Correction: 06/11/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.7 % (8.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 17.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.5 % (2.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14.3 % (5.08 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.9-24 % (8.4 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.3 % (10.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (64.55 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.2 % (2.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.7 % (14.16 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.7 % (32.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 10.3:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved