VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PLANTATION KEY NURSING CENTER

PLANTATION KEY NURSING CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PLANTATION KEY NURSING CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City TAVERNIER   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have TAVERNIER
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 48 HIGH POINT RD  
Zip Code 33070  
Phone 3058523021  
Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
(89.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
2 % (81.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/21/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/21/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 5  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
(89.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 05/15/2012
date Of Correction: 06/14/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 05/15/2012
date Of Correction: 06/14/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 05/15/2012
date Of Correction: 06/14/2012 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 05/15/2012
date Of Correction: 06/14/2012 

Emergency Plans and Fire Drills Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Record Of Quarterly Fire Drills For Each Shift Under Varying Conditions.
survey Date: 05/14/2012
date Of Correction: 06/21/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.9 % (4.12 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.7 % (13.06 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.9 % (6.96 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.3 % (20.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.1 % (3.66 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95 % (13.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90 % (15.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.2 % (13.14 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved