PLEASANT VALLEY MANOR, INC

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	STROUDSBURG	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have STROUDSBURG
State attribute explanation	PA	vs	4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA	compare PA Nursing Homes USA
Street	4227 MANOR DRIVE
Zip Code	18360
Phone	5709924172
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	174 (65.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (174)
Total Number of Residents	169 (77.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (169)
Percent of Occupied Beds	97 % (13.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (97) %
Health Survey Date	9/30/2011
Fire Survey Date	9/2/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Non Profit - Corporation	vs	18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation	compare Non profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	1 (57.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	1 (55.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	7 (0.48 lower than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	169 (77.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.59 (0.18 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.94 (0.1 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.53 (0.06 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.19 (5.3 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.19 (0.09 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 07/27/2010 date Of Correction: 09/27/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public. survey Date: 02/18/2010 date Of Correction: 04/19/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Residents' Abilities In Activities Of Daily Living Do Not Decline, Unless Unavoidable. survey Date: 11/02/2011 date Of Correction: 11/30/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 07/27/2010 date Of Correction: 09/27/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 06/02/2009 date Of Correction: 10/05/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/02/2009 date Of Correction: 08/18/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 06/02/2009 date Of Correction: 08/18/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	22.2:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.8 % (31.15 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	10.8 % (5.86 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	4.4 % (8.18 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	2.7 % (9.13 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	74.3 % (29.76 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.1 % (11.53 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	4.6 % (8.86 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	10.5 % (33.18 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	14.8 % (10.22 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	93.8 % (9.16 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	91.5 % (7.56 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.3 % (12.22 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	23.1 % (2.29 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.4 % (21.3 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	12.2 % (1.9 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	4.8 % (4.42 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4 % (4.5 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	71.6 % (28.22 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.2 % (6.45 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	0.4 % (19.46 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	9 % (29.53 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.8 % (7.93 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	19.7 % (5.06 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	91.7 % (10.26 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	89.4 % (14.65 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %