VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PLEASANT VALLEY MANOR, INC

PLEASANT VALLEY MANOR, INC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PLEASANT VALLEY MANOR, INC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City STROUDSBURG   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have STROUDSBURG
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 4227 MANOR DRIVE  
Zip Code 18360  
Phone 5709924172  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
174  (65.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
169  (77.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
97 % (13.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/30/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/2/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
169  (77.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.59  (0.18 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94  (0.1 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.53  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.19  (5.3 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.19  (0.09 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/27/2010
date Of Correction: 09/27/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 02/18/2010
date Of Correction: 04/19/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Residents' Abilities In Activities Of Daily Living Do Not Decline, Unless Unavoidable.
survey Date: 11/02/2011
date Of Correction: 11/30/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 07/27/2010
date Of Correction: 09/27/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 06/02/2009
date Of Correction: 10/05/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/02/2009
date Of Correction: 08/18/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 06/02/2009
date Of Correction: 08/18/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 22.2:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.8 % (31.15 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.8 % (5.86 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.4 % (8.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.7 % (9.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
74.3 % (29.76 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.1 % (11.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.6 % (8.86 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
10.5 % (33.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.8 % (10.22 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.8 % (9.16 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
91.5 % (7.56 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 % (12.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.1 % (2.29 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4 % (21.3 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.2 % (1.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.8 % (4.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4 % (4.5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
71.6 % (28.22 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.2 % (6.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.4 % (19.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
9 % (29.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8 % (7.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.7 % (5.06 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.7 % (10.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
89.4 % (14.65 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved