VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > POCAHONTAS MANOR CARE CENTER

POCAHONTAS MANOR CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
POCAHONTAS MANOR CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City POCAHONTAS   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have POCAHONTAS
State attribute explanation IA   vs 2.7% Nursing Homes USA have IA
Street 700 NW SEVENTH STREET  
Zip Code 50574  
Phone 7123353386  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
60  (48.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
44  (47.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
73 % (10.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/2/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/2/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
18  (10.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
44  (47.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.64  (0.13 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.24  (0.6 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.89  (0.7 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/15/2011
date Of Correction: 01/15/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/07/2011
date Of Correction: 11/11/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/25/2011
date Of Correction: 04/25/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 05/01/2012
date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 05/01/2012
date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 05/01/2012
date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves.
survey Date: 05/01/2012
date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 05/01/2012
date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 12/15/2011
date Of Correction: 01/15/2012 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 10/07/2011
date Of Correction: 11/11/2011 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 10/07/2011
date Of Correction: 11/11/2011 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 03/25/2011
date Of Correction: 04/25/2011 

Deficiency #9 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 03/25/2011
date Of Correction: 04/25/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 05/01/2012
date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Post Nurse Staffing Information/data On A Daily Basis.
survey Date: 12/15/2011
date Of Correction: 01/15/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Employ Qualified Full-time, Part-time Or Consultant Professionals That Must Be Licensed, Certified, Or Registered Staff To Give Needed Services.
survey Date: 09/02/2009
date Of Correction: 10/02/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Receive Registry Verification That A Nurse Aide Has Met The Required Training And Skills That The State Requires; And 2) Ensure Nurse Aides Receive The Required Retraining After 24 Months If Nursing Related Services Were Not Provided For Monetary Compensation
survey Date: 09/02/2009
date Of Correction: 10/02/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Menus Meet The Resident's Nutritional Needs And That There Is A Prepared Menu By Which Nutritious Meals Have Been Planned For The Resident And Followed.
survey Date: 05/01/2012
date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 14.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.7 % (11.93 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.8 % (2.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
13.5 % (2.02 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.3 % (12.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 11.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.5 % (5.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.7 % (3.8 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
46.7 % (3.32 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.4 % (6.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.5 % (2.08 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.3 % (10.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.3 % (1.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.4 % (11.64 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
48.8 % (32.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
63.4 % (11.35 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved