Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
POCAHONTAS MANOR CARE CENTER | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
44 (47.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.64 (0.13 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.24 (0.6 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.89 (0.7 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.01 (5.48 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.01 (0.09 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 12/15/2011 date Of Correction: 01/15/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 10/07/2011 date Of Correction: 11/11/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 03/25/2011 date Of Correction: 04/25/2011 |
Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 05/01/2012 date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 05/01/2012 date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 05/01/2012 date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves. survey Date: 05/01/2012 date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 05/01/2012 date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 12/15/2011 date Of Correction: 01/15/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #6 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 10/07/2011 date Of Correction: 11/11/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #7 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 10/07/2011 date Of Correction: 11/11/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #8 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 03/25/2011 date Of Correction: 04/25/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #9 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 03/25/2011 date Of Correction: 04/25/2011 |
Resident Assessment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 05/01/2012 date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 |
Administration Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Post Nurse Staffing Information/data On A Daily Basis. survey Date: 12/15/2011 date Of Correction: 01/15/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Employ Qualified Full-time, Part-time Or Consultant Professionals That Must Be Licensed, Certified, Or Registered Staff To Give Needed Services. survey Date: 09/02/2009 date Of Correction: 10/02/2009 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Receive Registry Verification That A Nurse Aide Has Met The Required Training And Skills That The State Requires; And 2) Ensure Nurse Aides Receive The Required Retraining After 24 Months If Nursing Related Services Were Not Provided For Monetary Compensation survey Date: 09/02/2009 date Of Correction: 10/02/2009 |
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Menus Meet The Resident's Nutritional Needs And That There Is A Prepared Menu By Which Nutritious Meals Have Been Planned For The Resident And Followed. survey Date: 05/01/2012 date Of Correction: 06/01/2012 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication | 14.7:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.1 / 8.8 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
3.7 % (11.93 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
10.8 % (2.66 % lower than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms | 8.1 / 8.8 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 (29.3 higher than average)
|
vs |
45.90
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
13.5 % (2.02 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
13.3 % (12.09 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased | 5.6:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain | 11.8:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
3.5 % (5.72 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
4.7 % (3.8 % lower than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
46.7 % (3.32 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
4.4 % (6.25 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
7.5 % (2.08 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
9.3 % (10.56 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
9.3 % (1.43 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
36.4 % (11.64 % higher than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
48.8 % (32.64 % lower than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
63.4 % (11.35 % lower than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|