VS
Login
Sign Up
Compare +
Rankings
Comparisons

Home > Nursing Homes USA > POCATELLO CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER

POCATELLO CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
POCATELLO CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City POCATELLO   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have POCATELLO
State attribute explanation ID   vs 0.6% Nursing Homes USA have ID
compare ID Nursing Homes USA
Street 527 MEMORIAL DRIVE  
Zip Code 83201  
Phone 2084783333  
Overall Star Rating
1  (2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating
1  (1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3  (0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating
2  (1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating
3  (0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds
88  (20.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (88)
Total Number of Residents
65  (26.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Compare similar Total Number of Residents (65)
Percent of Occupied Beds
74 % (9.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (74) %
Health Survey Date 1/13/2012  
Fire Survey Date 8/16/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
2  (56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
4  (52.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 35  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
65  (26.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.76  (0.01 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.96  (0.12 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.72  (0.13 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.2  (5.29 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.2  (0.1 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 05/03/2012 
Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 05/26/2011
date Of Correction: 06/30/2011 
Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/20/2009 
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 05/03/2012 
Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 05/26/2011
date Of Correction: 06/30/2011 
Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/06/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 
Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/20/2009 
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 05/03/2012 
Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 05/26/2011
date Of Correction: 06/30/2011 
Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 08/06/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 
Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 08/06/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 
Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Has The Right To Have A Choice Over Activities, Their Schedules And Health Care According To His Or Her Interests, Assessment, And Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 10/23/2009
date Of Correction: 11/27/2009 
Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 10/23/2009
date Of Correction: 11/27/2009 
Deficiency #7 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/20/2009 
Deficiency #8 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/20/2009 
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 05/03/2012 
Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 05/03/2012 
Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 05/03/2012 
Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 01/13/2012
date Of Correction: 02/16/2012 
Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 01/13/2012
date Of Correction: 02/16/2012 
Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 05/26/2011
date Of Correction: 06/30/2011 
Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/26/2011
date Of Correction: 06/30/2011 
Deficiency #8 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 11/19/2010
date Of Correction: 12/27/2010 
Deficiency #9 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 08/06/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 
Deficiency #10 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/06/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 
Deficiency #11 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 08/06/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 
Deficiency #12 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/20/2009 
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 05/03/2012 
Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 08/06/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 08/06/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 
Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Set Up A Group That Is Legally Responsible For Writing And Setting Up Policies For Leading And Running The Nursing Home; Or 2) Hire A Properly Licensed Administrator.
survey Date: 08/06/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/20/2009 
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Paid Feeding Assistants 1) Completed Training; 2) Works Under The Supervision Of A Rn Or Lpn; And 3) Feeds Only Residents Who Have No Complicated Feeding Problems.
survey Date: 01/13/2012
date Of Correction: 02/16/2012 
Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Provide 3 Meals At Regular Times; 2) Serve Breakfast Within 14 Hours After Dinner; Or 3) Offer A Snack At Bedtime Each Day.
survey Date: 01/13/2012
date Of Correction: 02/16/2012 
Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Provide 3 Meals At Regular Times; 2) Serve Breakfast Within 14 Hours After Dinner; Or 3) Offer A Snack At Bedtime Each Day.
survey Date: 07/16/2009
date Of Correction: 08/20/2009 
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 19.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.9 % (7.24 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.20 % (9.63 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.1 % (8.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 12.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2 % (26.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37 % (11.98 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.2 % (2.56 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
91 % (7.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.4 % (44.5 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 % (13.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.3 % (11.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.3 % (23.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
30.6 % (16.5 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.8 % (1.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.9 % (5.6 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
60.8 % (17.42 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
11.2-20 % (0.55 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.5 % (1.92 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.4 % (13.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.7 % (37.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.7 % (10.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37.5 % (12.74 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
57.1 % (24.34 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
85.6 % (10.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
13 % (4.34 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved
About  |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy  |  FAQ  |  Contact
Copyright © 2012 Comparical