VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > POINTE COUPEE HEALTHCARE

POINTE COUPEE HEALTHCARE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
POINTE COUPEE HEALTHCARE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City NEW ROADS   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have NEW ROADS
State attribute explanation LA   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have LA
Street 1820 FALSE RIVER ROAD  
Zip Code 70760  
Phone 2256384431  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
117  (25.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
98 % (14.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/8/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/9/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
117  (25.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.36  (0.41 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.69  (0.15 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.05  (0.54 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/15/2009
date Of Correction: 07/09/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 05/18/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed.
survey Date: 06/15/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 06/15/2009
date Of Correction: 07/09/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 07/13/2010
date Of Correction: 07/29/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 05/18/2010
date Of Correction: 06/18/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 02/19/2010
date Of Correction: 03/25/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.9 % (1.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.4 % (25.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.3 % (4.64 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
17.9 (64.2) % (5.32 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.7 % (8.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
6.5 % (38.04 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.2 % (10.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.8 % (10.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.7 % (25.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
12.4-2413.6-24 % (31.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4 % (11.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23 % (2.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 9.4 / 10.4 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.3 % (0.2 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.6 % (0.38 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.3 % (5.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
4.9 % (38.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.5 % (7.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.7 % (6.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4 % (17.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
10.8 % (27.73 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8 % (6.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.5 % (2.74 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
28.6 % (46.15 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5.9 % (11.44 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved