PORT CHARLOTTE REHABILITATION CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	PORT CHARLOTTE	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have PORT CHARLOTTE
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	25325 RAMPART BLVD
Zip Code	33948
Phone	9416297466
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	5 (1.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (5)
Quality Measures Star Rating	1 (2.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (1)
RN Only Star Rating	5 (1.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (5)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	112 (20.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (112)
Percent of Occupied Beds	93 % (9.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (93) %
Health Survey Date	10/7/2011
Fire Survey Date	10/4/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	None	vs	3.9% Nursing Homes USA have None
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	15

Staff Information
Number of Residents	112 (20.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.34 (0.57 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.28 (0.44 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	2.61 (1.02 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.15 (5.34 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.15 (0.05 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 04/05/2010 date Of Correction: 05/05/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Tell The Resident Completely About His Or Her Health Status, Care And Treatments. survey Date: 08/04/2010 date Of Correction: 09/04/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 02/24/2010 date Of Correction: 03/24/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 12/30/2009 date Of Correction: 01/30/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 12/18/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 12/18/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 08/04/2010 date Of Correction: 09/04/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 08/04/2010 date Of Correction: 09/04/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 04/05/2010 date Of Correction: 05/05/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 02/24/2010 date Of Correction: 03/24/2010
Deficiency #7		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 02/24/2010 date Of Correction: 03/24/2010
Deficiency #8		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 12/30/2009 date Of Correction: 01/30/2010
Deficiency #9		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Routine And 24-hour Emergency Dental Care For Each Resident. survey Date: 07/08/2009 date Of Correction: 07/24/2009
Deficiency #10		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 07/08/2009 date Of Correction: 07/24/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 12/18/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	24.7 % (0.39 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.8 % (31.15 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	33.4 % (16.74 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6.5 % (6.08 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	13.2 % (1.37 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	46.2 % (1.66 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	8 % (7.63 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	12.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.4 % (23.98 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.20 % (41.48 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	35.2 % (10.18 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	84.7 % (0.06 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	93.6 % (9.66 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	5.4 % (40.5 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	8.8 % (6.72 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	23.7 (74.7) % (1.69 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.7 % (22 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	34.2 % (20.1 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	5.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	15.6 % (7.1 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	47.2 % (3.82 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.8 % (5.85 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	13 % (3.42 % higher than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	2.9 % (16.96 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.20 % (36.33 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	5.8 % (4.93 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	33.5 % (8.74 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	47 % (34.44 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	86.2 % (11.45 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	21 % (3.66 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %