VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PORTER FIELD HEALTH & REHAB CENTER LLC

PORTER FIELD HEALTH & REHAB CENTER LLC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PORTER FIELD HEALTH & REHAB CENTER LLC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City MACON   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have MACON
State attribute explanation GA   vs 2.3% Nursing Homes USA have GA
Street 3051 WHITESIDE ROAD  
Zip Code 31216  
Phone 4787881421  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
143  (34.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
83  (8.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
58 % (25.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/3/2011  
Fire Survey Date 2/3/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 5  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
83  (8.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.3  (0.47 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.74  (0.9 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.04  (0.45 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/03/2011
date Of Correction: 03/20/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 02/03/2011
date Of Correction: 03/20/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 02/03/2011
date Of Correction: 03/20/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 02/03/2011
date Of Correction: 03/20/2011 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 02/03/2011
date Of Correction: 03/20/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30 % (4.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.7 % (9.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
16.7 % (4.12 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.3 % (7.53 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42.2 % (2.34 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.3 % (9.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.3 % (17.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.4 % (42.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 17.8:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.7 % (12.06 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.3 % (14.36 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.3 % (41.6 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7 % (8.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.6 % (6.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.7 % (23 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.9 % (9.2 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.3 % (4.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
43.6 % (0.22 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.5 - 2.0 % (10.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.3 % (4.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12 % (7.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.2 % (33.33 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.6 % (6.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.4 % (4.36 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.9 % (10.46 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.4 % (19.65 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.8 % (12.54 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved