VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PORTERVILLE CONVALESCENT HOSP

PORTERVILLE CONVALESCENT HOSP

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PORTERVILLE CONVALESCENT HOSP VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PORTERVILLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PORTERVILLE
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 1100 WEST MORTON AVENUE  
Zip Code 93257  
Phone 5597821509  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
99  (9.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
96  (4.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
97 % (13.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/13/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/19/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(5.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
96  (4.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 11/12/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 11/12/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19 % (6.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.7 % (12.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.6 % (10.98 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 17.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.2 % (11.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.1 % (4.36 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.5 % (41.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.5 % (1.48 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.7 % (6.06 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.5 % (12.56 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5 % (13.02 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.2 % (8.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.7 % (23 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10 % (4.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.5 % (6.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.8 % (5.3 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42.3 % (1.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.2 % (5.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.1 % (1.52 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.7 % (18.16 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.9 % (35.63 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9 % (7.83 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.5 % (10.26 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.1 % (0.66 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.8 % (20.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
18.4 % (1.06 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved